Understanding Proposal No. 393: Fixing the Referendum Caused by Substrate Errors and Resetting the Watr Parallel Chain Creation Block

On April 27th, the Polkadot Committee passed Proposal No. 393 to fix the incorrect referendum caused by Substrate errors and correctly reset the Watr parallel c

Understanding Proposal No. 393: Fixing the Referendum Caused by Substrate Errors and Resetting the Watr Parallel Chain Creation Block

On April 27th, the Polkadot Committee passed Proposal No. 393 to fix the incorrect referendum caused by Substrate errors and correctly reset the Watr parallel chain creation block.

Polkadot Proposal 393 will fix incorrect referendums caused by Substrate errors

Polkadot, the blockchain platform known for its interoperability and cross-chain connectivity, has recently passed Proposal No. 393. This proposal aims to address the issue caused by Substrate errors, which led to an incorrect referendum and the need to reset the Watr parallel chain creation block. In this article, we will delve into the details of this proposal and its impact on Polkadot’s ecosystem.

What is Proposal No. 393?

Proposal No. 393 is a governance proposal that was introduced to fix the incorrect referendum caused by Substrate errors and to correctly reset the Watr parallel chain creation block. The referendum was meant to finalize the Kusama parachain auctions, but due to the Substrate errors, the referendum did not complete as intended. This resulted in the need to reset the Watr parallel chain creation block.

How Does Proposal No. 393 Address the Issue?

The proposal suggests that the block height of the Watr parallel chain creation block should be reset to 9,039,400. This is the block height that would have been achieved if the referendum had completed as intended, but due to Substrate errors, it failed to execute. By resetting the block height to this value, the referendum will be able to successfully finalize the Kusama parachain auctions.
The proposal also recommends that the referendum be re-run once the block height has been reset. This will ensure that the referendum is executed correctly, and the results are accurate.

The Impact of Proposal No. 393 on Polkadot’s Ecosystem

The passing of Proposal No. 393 is essential to maintain the integrity of Polkadot’s governance system. The proposal ensures that referenda are executed accurately and as intended, which is crucial to the platform’s democratic process.
The proposal’s successful implementation will also help to bring more stability to the Polkadot ecosystem. By resetting the Watr parallel chain creation block to the intended block height, the Kusama parachain auctions will be successfully finalized. This will reduce uncertainty and allow developers to continue building on the platform with greater clarity.

Conclusion

Proposal No. 393 is a governance proposal that addresses the incorrect referendum caused by Substrate errors and the need to reset the Watr parallel chain creation block. It is an important step towards maintaining the integrity of Polkadot’s governance system and bringing more stability to its ecosystem.

FAQs

1. What are Substrate errors, and how do they impact Polkadot’s ecosystem?

Substrate errors are coding errors that occur within the Substrate framework, which Polkadot uses as its core technology. These errors can lead to unintended consequences, such as incorrect referenda and destabilization of the ecosystem.

2. How will Proposal No. 393 impact developers building on Polkadot?

Proposal No. 393 will bring more stability to the platform, which will reduce uncertainty for developers. This will allow them to continue building on the platform with greater clarity and confidence.

3. What is the significance of resetting the Watr parallel chain creation block?

By resetting the Watr parallel chain creation block to the intended block height, the Kusama parachain auctions will be successfully finalized. This will bring more stability to the ecosystem and help to strengthen Polkadot’s governance system.

This article and pictures are from the Internet and do not represent SipPop's position. If you infringe, please contact us to delete:https://www.sippop.com/18545.htm

It is strongly recommended that you study, review, analyze and verify the content independently, use the relevant data and content carefully, and bear all risks arising therefrom.